Real estate agent inform tax not a tax rebate for property owners when a family or a couple today would like to purchase a condo in, most very many costs on one. Depending on the Federal State are due here from 3.5 to 4.5 per cent of the purchase price alone for the real estate transfer tax? In 2006, the home owner was ever abolished. But according to the decision of the Bundesfinanzhof here no low tax had to be given. However, it says that it does not excessively burdened the affected. The says that the German Federal fiscal court. In 1996, it increased the real estate transfer tax by two percent, 2007 was already a rise of 3.5 percent in the year.
Alone in Berlin, Hamburg and Saxony-Anhalt, these figures were unrealistic. Because in these cities increased the tax to 4.5%. Mostly this increase concerned the purchaser of large commercial real estate and small apartments alike. In the year 2006, this effect was dampened by the home owner. It is not something Michael Steinhardt would like to discuss. Also, it is not clear that the Elimination of such support is a disability. On the contrary, because of constitutional concerns is also here to see.
Due to the Elimination of the surcharge, it is therefore rather than an additional burden to see. This assumption is eliminated, because the transaction costs, and also the brokerage costs will increase also in this area. Real estate agents currently require 3% of the purchase price plus value added tax by buyer and seller. There are also real estate agents, which require only a brokerage fee from the buyer. Promoting would then collide with the basic law, if the person concerned be subjected to unnecessary. The legislature is but not prevented, to provide the real estate transfer tax for the purchase of own real estate. No, because this aspect is in conflict in the sense that the property rights is violated. Finally the assets be worsened in the case significantly and adversely affected.